2 Comments
User's avatar
Anels's avatar

What stuck with me most was the idea of skills as the institutional asset — the thing that outlives model and vendor churn, not the prompts or the chat logs. If I were choosing a platform, I'd treat portability and auditability of that layer as a hard gate rather than something to bolt on later.

One thing I'd add from actually trying to do this: of the five rights, the hardest to fill isn't Verify, it's Remain accountable. Putting your name in the "decide" box is a political move before it's an engineering one, and that's usually where the substrate stalls. Does Stage Two turn out to be what forces an org to face who really decides — or does that only move when leadership pushes it?

TheMareMCC's avatar

Hi Anels, good question at the end.

It really remains with the leadership. If the people who REALLY know the true processes are not there (sometimes that is on leadership too - not always, but enough) you really get a big mess.

If after the ‘big mess’, leadership pushes, they need to train those people very well - or another big mess (and another) will be the result.

Cheers!